← Back to Week 13

Week 13: Evaluating LLMs - Metrics and Methods

Knowledge Check — Select an answer to see immediate feedback.

Questions 10
Question 1

A translation model tries to cheat by outputting just one word that happens to appear in the correct translation — and gets 100% precision. What does this reveal about using precision alone to evaluate translation quality?

Question 2

ROUGE measures how much of a reference summary is covered by a model's output. If the reference says "The cat sat on the mat" and the model outputs "The mat had a cat," ROUGE would still award partial credit because:

Question 3

Perplexity measures how surprised a language model is when it sees text it hasn't encountered before. What does a lower perplexity value indicate?

Question 4

The F1 score is defined as the harmonic mean of precision and recall. Why is the harmonic mean preferred over the arithmetic mean in this context?

Question 5

The GLUE and SuperGLUE benchmark suites are specifically designed to evaluate which aspect of large language models?

Question 6

One fundamental limitation of traditional metrics like BLEU and perplexity is that they focus on surface-level word overlap rather than meaning. Which evaluation approach has been proposed to better capture semantic understanding?

Question 7

In human evaluation protocols, inter-rater reliability measures agreement among multiple annotators. Which statistic is commonly used for this purpose?

Question 8

Behavioral evaluation of LLMs assesses chain-of-thought accuracy. What does this specifically evaluate?

Question 9

Blind evaluation is used as a systematic assessment technique in human evaluation protocols. What is its primary purpose?

Question 10

The HELM (Holistic Evaluation of Language Models) framework takes a more comprehensive approach than task accuracy alone. Which additional dimensions does HELM consider?