Unifying Proportional Fairness in Centroid and Non-Centroid Clustering

Benjamin Cookson (University of Toronto) · Nisarg Shah (University of Toronto) · Ziqi Yu (University of Toronto)
algorithmic generalizationapproximation algorithmscentroid clusteringclustering literaturecore representationdemocratic idealsdistance metricsfully justified representationloss measurementlower boundsnon-centroid clusteringpolynomial time complexityproportional fairnessrestricted loss functionssemi-centroid clustering

Proportional fairness criteria inspired by democratic ideals of proportional representation have received growing attention in the clustering literature. Prior work has investigated them in two separate paradigms. Chen et al. [ICML 2019] study _centroid clustering_, in which each data point's loss is determined by its distance to a representative point (centroid) chosen in its cluster. Caragiannis et al. [NeurIPS 2024] study _non-centroid clustering_, in which each data point's loss is determined by its maximum distance to any other data point in its cluster. We generalize both paradigms to introduce _semi-centroid clustering_, in which each data point's loss is a combination of its centroid and non-centroid losses, and study two proportional fairness criteria