On the Empirical Power of Goodness-of-Fit Tests in Watermark Detection

Li Shen (Sun Yat-Sen University) · Xiang Li (Nankai University) · Weijie Su (Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory) · Weiqing He (University of Pennsylvania) · Tianqi Shang (University of Pennsylvania) · Qi Long (University of Pennsylvania)
classic gof testscontent authenticitydetection powergeneration temperaturesgoodness-of-fit testslow-temperature settingsopen-source llmspivotal statisticspost-editing methodsrobustnessstatistical signalstext repetitiontext watermarkswatermark detectionwatermarking schemes

Large language models (LLMs) raise concerns about content authenticity and integrity because they can generate human-like text at scale. Text watermarks, which embed detectable statistical signals into generated text, offer a provable way to verify content origin. Many detection methods rely on pivotal statistics that are i.i.d. under human-written text, making goodness-of-fit (GoF) tests a natural tool for watermark detection. However, GoF tests remain largely underexplored in this setting. In this paper, we systematically evaluate eight GoF tests across three popular watermarking schemes, using three open-source LLMs, two datasets, various generation temperatures, and multiple post-editing methods. We find that general GoF tests can improve both the detection power and robustness of watermark detectors. Notably, we observe that text repetition, common in low-temperature settings, gives GoF tests a unique advantage not exploited by existing methods. Our results highlight that classic GoF tests are a simple yet powerful and underused tool for watermark detection in LLMs.