Maximizing the Value of Predictions in Control: Accuracy Is Not Enough

Zaiwei Chen (Purdue University) · Adam Wierman (Caltech) · Yiheng Lin (California Institute of Technology) · Christopher Yeh (California Institute of Technology)
closed-form expressioncontrol cost improvementgeneral dynamicsjoint distributionlower boundnon-quadratic costsonline optimal controlonline policy optimizationprediction accuracyprediction errorprediction powerrandom disturbancesstochastic predictionstime-varying linear quadratic regulatorweakly dependent predictions

We study the value of stochastic predictions in online optimal control with random disturbances. Prior work provides performance guarantees based on prediction error but ignores the stochastic dependence between predictions and disturbances. We introduce a general framework modeling their joint distribution and define "prediction power" as the control cost improvement from the optimal use of predictions compared to ignoring the predictions. In the time-varying Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) setting, we derive a closed-form expression for prediction power and discuss its mismatch with prediction accuracy and connection with online policy optimization. To extend beyond LQR, we study general dynamics and costs. We establish a lower bound on prediction power under two sufficient conditions that generalize the properties of the LQR setting, characterizing the fundamental benefit of incorporating stochastic predictions. We apply this lower bound to non-quadratic costs and show that even weakly dependent predictions yield significant performance gains.