CAPability: A Comprehensive Visual Caption Benchmark for Evaluating Both Correctness and Thoroughness

Nianzu Yang (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) · Hongtao Xie (University of Science and Technology of China) · Zhihang Liu (University of Science and Technology of China) · Chen-Wei Xie (Alibaba Group) · Bin Wen (Alibaba Group) · Feiwu Yu (Alibaba Group) · JixuanChen (Alibaba Group) · Pandeng Li (University of Science and Technology of China) · Boqiang Zhang (University of Science and Technology of China) · YingluLi (University of Science and Technology of China) · Zuan Gao · Yun Zheng (Alibaba Group)
benchmark evaluationheuristic metrichit metricsholistic analysishuman-annotated imageskeyword extractionknow but cannot tellmulti-view benchmarkmultimodal large language modelsobject-centric evaluationperformance gapprecision metricsqa pairsstrengths and weaknessesvisual captioningvisual element coverage

Visual captioning benchmarks have become outdated with the emergence of modern multimodal large language models (MLLMs), as the brief ground-truth sentences and traditional metrics fail to assess detailed captions effectively. While recent benchmarks attempt to address this by focusing on keyword extraction or object-centric evaluation, they remain limited to vague-view or object-view analyses and incomplete visual element coverage. In this paper, we introduce CAPability, a comprehensive multi-view benchmark for evaluating visual captioning across 12 dimensions spanning six critical views. We curate nearly 11K human-annotated images and videos with visual element annotations to evaluate the generated captions. CAPability stably assesses both the correctness and thoroughness of captions with \textit{precision} and \textit{hit} metrics. By converting annotations to QA pairs, we further introduce a heuristic metric, \textit{know but cannot tell} ($K\bar{T}$), indicating a significant performance gap between QA and caption capabilities. Our work provides a holistic analysis of MLLMs' captioning abilities, as we identify their strengths and weaknesses across various dimensions, guiding future research to enhance specific aspects of their capabilities.