NoBOOM: Chemical Process Datasets for Industrial Anomaly Detection

Stephan Mandt (University of California, Irvine) · Dennis Wagner (RPTU Kaiserslautern) · Sophie Fellenz (RPTU Kaiserslautern) · Marius Kloft (RPTU, Kaiserslautern) · Fabian Hartung (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Justus Arweiler (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern) · Aparna Muraleedharan (Technische Universität München) · Indra Jungjohann (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Arjun Nair (Universität Kaiserslautern) · Steffen Reithermann (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Ralf Schulz (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Michael Bortz (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Daniel Neider (TU Dortmund University) · Heike Leitte (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität) · Joachim Pfeffinger (BASF) · Torsten Katz (BASF) · Fabian Jirasek (RPTU Kaiserslautern) · Jakob Burger (Technische Universität München) · Hans Hasse (Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität)
anomaly detectionanomaly eventsautomated monitoringbenchmark datasetschemical processesdata analysisdata privacyindustrial applicationslaboratory-scale plantspilot-scale plantsprocess operationproprietary datasensor datatime seriestime-series anomaly detection (tsad)

Monitoring chemical processes is essential to prevent catastrophic failures, optimize costs and profits, and ensure the safety of employees and the environment. A key component of modern monitoring systems is the automated detection of anomalies in sensor data over time, called time series, enabling partial automation of plant operation and adding additional layers of supervision to crucial components. The development of anomaly detection methods in this domain is challenging, since real chemical process data are usually proprietary, and simulated data are generally not a sufficient replacement. In this paper, we present NoBOOM, the first collection of datasets for anomaly detection in real-world chemical process data, including labeled data from a running process at our industry partner BASF SE — one of the world’s leading chemical companies — and several chemical processes run in laboratory‑scale and pilot‑scale plants. While we are not able to share every detail about the industrial process, for the laboratory‑ and pilot‑scale plants, we provide comprehensive information on plant configuration, process operation, and, in particular, anomaly events, enabling a differentiated analysis of anomaly detection methods. To demonstrate the complexity of the benchmark, we analyze the data with regard to common issues of time-series anomaly detection (TSAD) benchmarks, including potential triviality and bias.