Position: Towards Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment

Joyce Chai (University of Michigan) · Hua Shen (NYU Shanghai, New York University) · Tiffany Knearem (Google) · Reshmi Ghosh (Microsoft Corp) · Kenan Alkiek (University of Michigan - Ann Arbor) · Kundan Krishna (Apple) · Liu Yachuan (University of Michigan) · Savvas Petridis (Google) · Yi-Hao Peng (Carnegie Mellon University) · Li Qiwei (University of Michigan - Ann Arbor) · Chenglei Si (Stanford University) · Yutong Xie (University of Michigan) · Jeffrey Bigham (Carnegie Mellon University) · Frank Bentley (Google) · Zachary Lipton (Carnegie Mellon University / Abridge) · Qiaozhu Mei (University of Michigan) · Michael Terry (Google) · Diyi Yang (Stanford University) · Meredith Morris (Google DeepMind) · Paul Resnick (University of Michigan - Ann Arbor) · David Jurgens (University of Michigan - Ann Arbor)
actionable recommendationsai technologiesalignmentbehavioral adaptationbidirectional frameworkcognitive adaptationcross-disciplinary collaborationhuman value modelinghuman-ai interactionlong-term interaction designmutual understandingoperationalizationresearch communitysocietal adaptationsystematic review

Recent advances in general-purpose AI underscore the urgent need to align AI systems with human goals and values. Yet, the lack of a clear, shared understanding of what constitutes "alignment" limits meaningful progress and cross-disciplinary collaboration. In this position paper, we argue that the research community should explicitly define and critically reflect on "alignment" to account for the bidirectional and dynamic relationship between humans and AI. Through a systematic review of over 400 papers spanning HCI, NLP, ML, and more, we examine how alignment is currently defined and operationalized. Building on this analysis, we introduce the Bidirectional Human-AI Alignment framework, which not only incorporates traditional efforts to align AI with human values but also introduces the critical, underexplored dimension of aligning humans with AI – supporting cognitive, behavioral, and societal adaptation to rapidly advancing AI technologies. Our findings reveal significant gaps in current literature, especially in long-term interaction design, human value modeling, and mutual understanding. We conclude with three central challenges and actionable recommendations to guide future research toward more nuanced, reciprocal, and human-AI alignment approaches.